Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Early childhood educator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. Daniel (talk) 08:27, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Early childhood educator

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has failed WP:DEL#REASON #7 for over four years. Ben^Yes? 23:38, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Early childhood education; merge anything useful. The page on the profession even lists prominent early childhood educators already. Ivanvector (talk) 04:36, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or redirect per WP:CHEAP and Gene. Bearian (talk) 18:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to early childhood education (which isn't doing that much better, but is an established topic). The educator article is unreferenced and the available refs pertain to the field and not the occupation (also it still reads like the essay it was at its 2005 creation). Redirect, and it can always break out summary-style again if need be. Nothing sourced to merge. czar ♔ 14:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.